Endocan as a biomarker for acute respiratory distress syndrome: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Behnoush Amir Hossein1ORCID,Khalaji Amirmohammad1ORCID,Ghasemi Hoomaan12ORCID,Tabatabaei Ghazaal Alavi3,Samavarchitehrani Amirsaeed4,Vaziri Zahra5,Najafi Morvarid12,Norouzi Mitra6,Ghondaghsaz Elina7,Amini Elahe8,Gaudet Alexandre9

Affiliation:

1. School of Medicine Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran

2. Center for Orthopedic Trans‐Disciplinary Applied Research Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran

3. Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan Iran

4. Islamic Azad University Tehran Faculty of Medicine Tehran Iran

5. Student Research Committee Babol University of Medical Sciences Babol Iran

6. Faculty of Life Sciences and Biotechnology Shahid Beheshti University Tehran Iran

7. Undergraduate Program in Neuroscience University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada

8. Tehran Medical Sciences Branch Islamic Azad University Tehran Iran

9. Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019‐UMR9017‐CIIL‐Centre d'Infection et d'Immunité de Lille, CHU Lille Pôle de Médecine Intensive‐Réanimation Lille France

Abstract

AbstractBackground and AimsEndocan is a marker of endothelial damage. Data regarding the association of this proteoglycan and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is discrepant. Hence, this study sought to investigate the possible correlation between serum/plasma endocan concentration and ARDS.MethodsA systematic review and meta‐analysis of international online databases was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, and Web of Science were searched in March 2023, with the leading search terms being “ARDS” OR “respiratory distress” AND “endocan” and other associated terms. Studies that measured endocan levels in patients with ARDS and compared it with non‐ARDS controls or within different severities of ARDS were included. We performed a random‐effect meta‐analysis for pooling the differences using standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI).ResultsWe included 14 studies involving 1,058 patients. Those developing ARDS had significantly higher levels of endocan compared to those without ARDS (SMD: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.10–0.84, p = 0.01). Our meta‐analysis of three studies found that endocan levels in ARDS nonsurvivors were significantly higher than in survivors (SMD: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.02–0.60, p = 0.03). Three studies investigated endocan levels in different severities of ARDS. Only one of these studies reported significantly higher endocan levels in patients with worsening acute respiratory failure at Day 15. The other two reported no significant association between ARDS severity and circulating endocan levels.ConclusionBlood endocan levels were significantly higher in patients with ARDS than those without. Additionally, among patients with ARDS, blood endocan values were significantly elevated in nonsurvivors compared to survivors. These findings could help researchers design future studies and solidify these findings and finally, clinicians to take advantage of measuring endocan in clinical settings for assessment of patients with ARDS.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3