Negative stress-coping strategies among novices in surgery correlate with poor virtual laparoscopic performance

Author:

Hassan I1,Weyers P2,Maschuw K1,Dick B3,Gerdes B1,Rothmund M1,Zielke A4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany

2. Department of Psychology, University of Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany

3. Department of Psychotherapeutic and Psychosomatic Medicine, Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany

4. Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Endocrine Surgery, Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Background This study explored the impact of habitual stress-coping strategies on the laparoscopic performance of novices in surgery using a virtual reality simulator. Methods The SVF78 stress-coping questionnaire was administered to 12 medical students in their final year of medical school (camera holders) and to 12 inexperienced surgical residents (postgraduate years 1–3). The questionnaire included devaluation during stressful situations, distractions from stressful situations, control over stressful reactions and negative coping strategies such as stress avoidance and need for social support. Assessment of laparoscopic dexterity was based on the results of performance on a virtual reality simulator. The variables of time taken to complete the task, errors and economy of motion were analysed, with a higher score indicating poor performance. Pearson and non-parametric Spearman correlations were used to compare the subjects' results on the SVF78 with those on the LapSim®. Results Time taken to complete the task correlated with high values in distractive stress-coping strategies (P = 0·002) and high values in negative stress-coping strategies (P = 0·042). Conclusion Ineffective stress-coping strategies correlate with poor virtual laparoscopic performance. The need for effective intraoperative stress-coping strategies is evident.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 100 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3