Cutting balloon to optimize predilation for stent implantation: The COPS randomized trial

Author:

Mangieri Antonio1ORCID,Nerla Roberto2ORCID,Castriota Fausto2,Reimers Bernhard1,Regazzoli Damiano1,Leone Pier P.1ORCID,Gasparini Gabriele L.1,Khokhar Arif A.3ORCID,Laricchia Alessandra4,Giannini Francesco2ORCID,Casale Fulvio5,Bezzeccheri Andrea5ORCID,Briguori Carlo5ORCID,Colombo Antonio67

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardio Center IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano Italy

2. Department of Cardio‐Thoracic GVM Care and Research Maria Cecilia Hospital Cotignola Italy

3. Department of Cardio‐Thoracic Cardiology Service Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust London UK

4. Department of Cardiovascular ASST Santi Paolo Carlo Milano Italy

5. Department of Cardiology Mediterranea Cardiocentro Naples Italy

6. Department of Biomedical Sciences Humanitas University Milan Italy

7. Department of Cardiology Cardio Center IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzana Italy

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThe objective of this study is to investigate the use of cutting balloon (CB) inflated at high pressure compared with noncompliant balloon (NCB) for the treatment of calcified coronary lesions.BackgroundNo data are available regarding the safety and efficacy of CB inflated at high pressure in coronary artery calcifications.MethodsPatients with calcified lesions (more than 100° of calcium demonstrated at baseline intravascular ultrasound) were randomized. Primary endpoint of the study was the final minimal stent area (MSA) and stent symmetry in the calcific segment. Secondary endpoints included rate of device failure and the 1‐year rate of target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, and major adverse cardiovascular events.ResultsFrom September 2019 to June 2021, a total of 100 patients were included and randomized; 13 patients were excluded for major protocol deviations. Lesions were complex (type B2/C n = 61 [71.2%]) with a mean arch of calcium of 266 ± 84°, a calcium length of 12 ± 6.6 mm. CB was inflated at comparable atmospheres when compared with NCB (18.3 ± 5 vs. 19 ± 4.5, p = 0.46). In the per‐protocol population, the final MSA at the level of the calcium site was significantly higher in the CB group (8.1 ± 2 vs. 7.3 ± 2.1, p = 0.035) with a higher eccentricity index achieved in the CB group (0.84 ± 0.07 vs. 0.8 ± 0.08, p = 0.013). Three device failure occurred in the CB group. One‐year follow‐up outcomes were comparable.ConclusionsTreatment of calcified lesions with high‐pressure CB has a good safety profile and is associated with a larger MSA and higher eccentricity of the stent at the level of the calcium site compared with NCB.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3