Investigations on the Suitability of Alternative and Supplementary Cementitious Materials to produce High Performance Aerogel Concrete

Abstract

AbstractHigh Performance Aerogel Concretes (HPAC) are produced by embedding silica aerogels in high‐performance matrices, which were previously based on finely ground Portland cement CEM I 52.5 R and microsilica. On the one hand, this ensured a comparatively high compressive strength, but on the other hand it was associated with large shrinkage strains and a high global warming potential (GWP). In the following, approaches are presented on how these disadvantages can be counteracted by replacing Portland cement with alternative (ACM) or supplementary cementitious materials (SCM). In the experimental investigations, calcium aluminate cement, calcium sulfoaluminate cement, calcium sulfoaluminate belite cement and a CSH phase binder were used as ACMs; limestone powder, calcined clay, fly ash, glass powder, rice husk ash, brick dust and ground granulated blast‐furnace slag were used as SCMs. Based on extensive fresh and hardened concrete tests, it could be shown that with the (partial) replacement of Portland cement by ACMs or SCMs, High Performance Aerogel Concretes can be produced that have significantly reduced shrinkage deformations and a lower GWP with an unchanged good relationship between compressive strength and thermal conductivity.