Modern slavery and the Global Reporting Initiative – A bridge too far?

Author:

Burritt Roger Leonard1ORCID,Christ Katherine Leanne2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Fenner School of Environment and Society, College of Science The Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia

2. University of South Australia Business University of South Australia Adelaide South Australia Australia

Abstract

AbstractAs the Global Reporting Initiative currently provides the most widely used set of voluntary sustainability reporting standards, the question arises as to the extent to which the Initiative's multi‐stakeholder governance is helping towards ending modern slavery in line with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 8. Stakeholder theory and examination of the Initiative's sustainability standards are used, to examine the issue. Evidence from the Initiative's set of universal, topic and sector standards reveals that, while forced and child labour are identified as granular material topics for sustainability reporting, the broader concept of modern slavery has not been recognised as a required material theme for disclosure. One recent exception is voluntary publication of three new sector standards, where the modern slavery term appears to be introduced as a symbolic rather than a substantive notion. Main contributions from the research relate to, first, providing a critique of the multi‐stakeholder foundations for governance as used by the Initiative; second, examination of the results of the Initiative's standard setting process in terms of its standards and their incorporation of modern slavery, from a multi‐stakeholder governance perspective with the hope of improving governance in the future.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Strategy and Management,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Development

Reference71 articles.

1. Accounting for Sustainability (A4S) and Accounting Bodies Network (ABN). (2021).Navigating the reporting landscape.https://www.accountingforsustainability.org/content/dam/a4s/corporate/home/KnowledgeHub/Guide-pdf/Navigating%20the%20Reporting%20Landscape.pdf.downloadasset.pdf

2. Connecting the COVID-19 pandemic, environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing and calls for ‘harmonisation’ of sustainability reporting

3. Australian Council of Superannuation Investors (ACSI). (2021).Moving from paper to practice: ASX200 reporting under Australia's Modern Slavery Act.https://acsi.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/ACSI_ModernSlavery_July2021.pdf

4. Biodiversity disclosure in Australia: effect of GRI and institutional factors

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3