Binocular microscopes versus exoscopes: Experiences and performance in simulated otologic surgery

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesExoscopes represent a promising alternative to conventional binocular microscopes (OM) in otology offering potential advantages such as enhanced ergonomics and a more compact device design. While previous research has demonstrated the effectiveness of exoscopes in various surgical specialties, their objective assessment in the field of otology remains limited. Therefore, this investigation aims to assess task‐based efficiency associated with exoscopes in the field of otology by use of simulated surgical models.MethodsA prospective cross‐over study design was used to compare an OM to an exoscope in otolaryngology residents and medical students. Participants performed five tasks on 3D‐printed ear models using both the exoscope and OM. Data collection included completion time, frequency of predefined errors, mental effort, and user experience. Subgroup analysis was performed based on level of experience.ResultsFourteen students and fifteen residents participated. Participants completed four of five tasks faster with the OM and there was no difference in number of errors committed. When separated by surgical experience, residents performed four of five tasks faster using the OM while students completed one of five tasks faster with the OM. Students committed more errors with the exoscope for one task with no difference in errors for residents. There was no difference in perceived difficulty performing tasks with either visualization system. Exit survey results showed more favorable opinions of the OM among residents and more favorable opinions of the exoscope among students.ConclusionsThe exoscope permits successful performance in simulated otologic tasks. Task performance and user experience between operative microscopes and exoscopes differ based on level of surgical experience.Level of Evidence2.