Impact of a feedback strategy in a series of communication‐focused patient care simulations

Author:

Rao Hindu1ORCID,Beuttler Richard1ORCID,Dintzner Madeline1ORCID,Taheri Reza1ORCID,Bach Albert T.1ORCID,Fakourfar Neeloufar1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacy Practice Chapman University School of Pharmacy Irvine California USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionPatient care simulations (PCS) and objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) allow pharmacy students to practice communication. Feedback can help improve communication, but the impact over time is not well understood.ObjectiveThis study investigated the impact of a feedback strategy on pharmacy students' communication skills over three PCS. It also evaluated the alignment between students' self‐scoring and faculty scoring.MethodsPharmacy students participated in three sessions (PCS1, OSCE, and PCS3) that were focused on the affective domain. Individualized numerical and narrative feedback was provided to students on their performance after PCS1. Students' communication was scored by faculty graders out of an 18‐point validated rubric. Students self‐scored their communication with the same rubric. Faculty and student scores were compared using a linear mixed effects model, and an intraclass correlation coefficient was used to measure agreement.ResultsIn PCS1, 82 students scored an average of 15.41 ± 2.14 for faculty scores and 16.06 ± 1.55 for self‐graded scores (0.36, p < 0.001). In the OSCE, 81 students had an average of 15.93 ± 1.86 for faculty scores and 16.45 ± 1.35 for self‐graded scores (0.1, p = 0.18). In PCS3, 74 students scored an average of 15.22 ± 2.15 for faculty scores and 16.25 ± 1.44 for self‐graded scores (0.14, p = 0.08). A correlation between faculty and student scores was seen for PCS1. Over the three sessions, no significant differences were found between student self‐graded scores (p = 0.08), but faculty scores did differ, with the OSCE having higher scores than PCS3 (p < 0.01). Many students with faculty‐graded scores greater than 1 standard deviation below the mean scored themselves higher than faculty did.ConclusionFeedback after PCS1 did not significantly improve scores. Students with low faculty‐graded scores frequently scored themselves higher indicating low self‐awareness.

Funder

Chapman University

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3