Publons as a source of high volume, poorly targeted reviewer requests: The need for better standards of practice by publishers-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Publons as a source of high volume, poorly targeted reviewer requests: The need for better standards of practice by publishers

Published:2021-08-31 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:0953-1513
Container-title:Learned Publishing
language:en
Short-container-title:Learned Publishing

Author:

Jorm Anthony F.¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Communication

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/leap.1420

Reference3 articles.

1. The $450 question: Should journals pay peer reviewers?;Brainard J.;Science,2021

2. Elsevier Sense About Science. (2019).Quality trust & peer review: researchers' perspectives 10 years on.https://senseaboutscience.org/wp‐content/uploads/2019/09/Quality‐trust‐peer‐review.pdf.

3. Finding reviewers: A crisis for journals and their authors

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Spotting potential reviewers for interdisciplinary research: insights on active reviewers from Publons;Scientometrics;2024-08-09

2. Prejudice, Interests, Jealousy: Inappropriate Peer Reviewers May Be Exacerbating Inequality in Academic Publication in Health Research;Journal of Korean Medical Science;2023

3. The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review;Publishing Research Quarterly;2022-09-19

4. Would You Review Seven Papers a Day, Every Day, For a Year?;Publishing Research Quarterly;2022-08-01

5. What More Can We Do in Peer Review to Achieve Equity in Scientific Publication?;Health Services Insights;2022-01