Impella and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction

Abstract

AbstractAimsThis study aimed to give contemporary insight into the use of Impella and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA‐ECMO) in acute myocardial infarction‐related cardiogenic shock (AMICS) and into associated outcomes, adverse events, and resource demands.Methods and resultsThis nationwide observational cohort study describes all AMICS patients treated with Impella (ABIOMED, Danvers, MA, USA) and/or VA‐ECMO in 2020–2021. Impella and/or VA‐ECMO were used in 20% of all AMICS cases (n = 4088). Impella patients were older (34% vs. 13% >75 years, p < 0.001) and less frequently presented after an out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest (18% vs. 40%, p < 0.001). In‐hospital mortality was lower in the Impella versus VA‐ECMO cohort (61% vs. 67%, p = 0.001). Adverse events occurred less frequently in Impella‐supported patients: acute haemorrhagic anaemia (36% vs. 68%, p < 0.001), cerebrovascular accidents (4% vs. 11%, p < 0.001), thromboembolisms of the extremities (5% vs. 8%, p < 0.001), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (21% vs. 25%, p = 0.004), acute kidney injury (44% vs. 53%, p < 0.001), and acute liver failure (7% vs. 12%, p < 0.001). Impella patients were discharged home directly more often (20% vs. 11%, p < 0.001) whereas VA‐ECMO patients were more often discharged to another care facility (22% vs. 19%, p = 0.031). Impella patients had shorter hospital stays and lower hospital costs.ConclusionThis is the largest, most recent European cohort study describing outcomes, adverse events, and resource demands based on claims data in patients with Impella and/or VA‐ECMO. Overall, adverse event rates and resource consumption were high. Given the current lack of beneficial evidence, our study reinforces the need for prospectively established, high‐quality evidence to guide clinical decision‐making.