Emotion Regulation and Mentalization in Patients With Depression and Anxiety

Author:

Bryde Christensen Anne12ORCID,Poulsen Stig2,Højberg Trine Munk23,Jessen Stine Bech2,Reinholt Nina4,Hvenegaard Morten5,Eskildsen Anita6,Arendt Mikkel67,Arnfred Sidse48

Affiliation:

1. Center for Eating and feeding Disorders Research, Mental Health Center Ballerup Copenhagen University Hospital – Mental Health Services Capital Region of Denmark Copenhagen Denmark

2. Department of Psychology University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

3. Child and Adolescent Mental Health Centre Mental Health Services Capital Region of Denmark Copenhagen Denmark

4. Psychiatric Research Unit, Psychiatry Region Zealand Copenhagen University Hospital Slagelse Denmark

5. Department of Crisis Psychology Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark

6. Department of Affective Disorders Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark

7. Department of Clinical Medicine Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark

8. Department of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectiveTheoretical conceptualizations of emotion and affect regulation have a considerable common ground. However, mentalization theory considers the ability to regulate affects as being contingent on the ability to mentalize. The aim of the present study is to examine the association between emotion regulation and mentalization, operationalized as reflective functioning, in a sample of patients with depression and/or anxiety.MethodsThe study used data from the TRAns‐diagnostic Cognitive behavioural Therapy versus standard cognitive behavioural therapy (TRACT‐RCT) trial. Patients with depression and/or anxiety (N = 291; 64.4% female; Mage = 32.2; SD = 11.0) completed the Emotion Regulation Strategies Questionnaire (ERSQ) and the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ‐6). Correlation and regression analyses were performed to determine associations of the measures of ERSQ and RFQ‐6 in relation to the outcome variables, global well‐being (World Health Organization Well‐being Index; WHO‐5) and social functioning (Work and Social Adjustment Scale; WSAS).ResultsOverall, the patients had a reduced level of emotion regulation (MERSQ_Total = 1.77; SD = 0.59). However, only mildly impaired reflective functioning was found (MRFQ‐6 = 3.57; SD = 1.26). ERSQ correlated significantly with RFQ‐6 (r = −0.31), that is, more frequent use of emotion regulation strategies was associated with less hypomentalization. ERSQ was a stronger predictor of well‐being and social function than RFQ‐6.ConclusionIn patients with anxiety and/or depression, hypomentalization as measured by the RFQ‐6 is not a major problem, but emotion regulation is. It seems that these two, theoretically related constructs, do not necessarily co‐occur. Alternatively, the RFQ‐6 scale might not capture the mentalization construct in a valid way. Emotion regulation strategies are highly related to symptomatology; therefore, they are likely to be an important target for psychotherapy.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3