Affiliation:
1. European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC) Ispra Italy
2. AMAP, Université de Montpellier, CIRAD, CNRS, INRAE, IRD Montpellier France
3. INRIA Sophia‐Antipolis ZENITH Team, LIRMM Montpellier France
Abstract
Abstract
Large‐scale biodiversity monitoring is essential for assessing biodiversity trends, yet traditional surveying methods are limited in the spatial/temporal scale they can cover. Recent technological developments have led to computer vision‐based species identification tools, such as the Pl@ntNet application. Increasing accuracy of such algorithms presents an opportunity of integrating computer vision into larger monitoring schemes and could lead to automating ground‐based evidence provision related to agri‐environmental measures (e.g. flower strips, field margins). However, images from surveys or farmer declarations do not live up to the standards of current applications. In order to integrate these automated methods into biodiversity monitoring, more generalized models are needed.
We create a dataset using 500 manually delineated images of vegetation patches in European grasslands taken during the Land Use/cover Area Survey (LUCAS) grassland module. We train the Faster R‐CNN model to detect and extract individual flower objects. Using this model, we extract the abundance of flowers in an image, analyse their colour distribution, and use the Pl@ntNet application to identify the species of the individual flowers detected.
The best model reaches precision and recall of 0.89/0.61 and predicts 1377 flowers on the 100 test images distributed between 10 colours. Using Pl@ntNet, only 52 flowers were identified with a certainty score above 0.5 due to the limitations in image size and quality. Of these flowers, 30% were correctly automatically identified at the species level and 42% at the genus level.
The results show that we can automatically extract valuable information on floral abundances, colours, and sizes from images of vegetation patches, though in most cases better images are needed for species identification. Despite limitations with image quality, integrating this workflow into large‐scale monitoring could speed up the sampling process and allow for better spatial and temporal data on floral diversity and abundance.
Funder
Instituto de Física de Cantabria
Reference56 articles.
1. Affouard A. Goëau H. Bonnet P. Lombardo J. C. Affouard A. Goëau H. Bonnet P. Lombardo J. C. Joly A. Christophe Lombardo J. &Joly A.(2017).ICLR (International Conference On Learning Representations) 2017 Workshop. Pl@ntnet App in the Era of Deep Learning.
2. Emerging technologies for biological recording
3. AI Naturalists Might Hold the Key to Unlocking Biodiversity Data in Social Media Imagery
4. Bao H. Dong L. Piao S. &Wei F.(2021).Beit: Bert pre‐training of image transformers.https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2106.08254
5. Barmeier G.(2021).Detection of individual plants on grassland by using geotagged photos.https://marswiki.jrc.ec.europa.eu/wikicap/images/5/57/09_Detection_of_individual_plants.pdf
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献