Test–retest reliability of Bayesian estimations of the effects of stimulation, prior information and individual traits on pain perception

Author:

Delgado‐Sanchez Ariane1ORCID,Charalambous Christiana1,Trujillo‐Barreto Nelson J.1,Safi Hannah23,Jones Anthony1,Sivan Manoj4,Talmi Deborah5,Brown Christopher6

Affiliation:

1. School of Health Sciences University of Manchester Manchester UK

2. Department of Medical Physics, Salford Royal Foundation Trust Northern Care Alliance Salford UK

3. Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, School of Engineering University of Manchester Manchester UK

4. Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine University of Leeds Leeds UK

5. Department of Psychology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

6. Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool and Human Pain Research Group University of Liverpool Liverpool UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThere is inter‐individual variability in the influence of different components (e.g. nociception and expectations) on pain perception. Identifying the individual effect of these components could serve for patient stratification, but only if these influences are stable in time.MethodsIn this study, 30 healthy participants underwent a cognitive pain paradigm in which they rated pain after viewing a probabilistic cue informing of forthcoming pain intensity and then receiving electrical stimulation. The trial information was then used in a Bayesian probability model to compute the relative weight each participant put on stimulation, cue, cue uncertainty and trait‐like bias. The same procedure was repeated 2 weeks later. Relative and absolute test–retest reliability of all measures was assessed.ResultsIntraclass correlation results showed good reliability for the effect of the stimulation (0.83), the effect of the cue (0.75) and the trait‐like bias (0.75 and 0.75), and a moderate reliability for the effect of the cue uncertainty (0.55). Absolute reliability measures also supported the temporal stability of the results and indicated that a change in parameters corresponding to a difference in pain ratings ranging between 0.47 and 1.45 (depending on the parameters) would be needed to consider differences in outcomes significant. The comparison of these measures with the closest clinical data we possess supports the reliability of our results.ConclusionsThese findings support the hypothesis that inter‐individual differences in the weight placed on different pain factors are stable in time and could therefore be a possible target for patient stratification.SignificanceOur results demonstrate the temporal stability of the weight healthy individuals place on the different factors leading to the pain response. These findings give validity to the idea of using Bayesian estimations of the influence of different factors on pain as a way to stratify patients for treatment personalization.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3