Psychological treatments for mental health symptoms associated with COVID‐19 infection: A scoping review

Author:

Sugita So1ORCID,Hata Kotone2,Kodaiarasu Krandhasi3,Takamatsu Naoki14ORCID,Kimura Kentaro1,Miller Christian5,Gonzalez Lecsy6,Umemoto Ikue1,Murayama Keitaro7ORCID,Nakao Tomohiro8,Kito Shinsuke19,Ito Masaya1,Kuga Hironori1

Affiliation:

1. National Center for Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Research National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry Tokyo Japan

2. Faculty of Human Sciences Waseda University Tokyo Japan

3. McLean Hospital, Simches Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Belmont Massachusetts USA

4. Department of Neuropsychiatry The University of Tokyo Hospital Tokyo Japan

5. Cornell University Ithaca New York USA

6. University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA

7. Department of Neuropsychiatry Kyushu University Hospital Fukuoka Japan

8. Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medical Sciences Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan

9. Department of Psychiatry, National Center Hospital National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry Tokyo Japan

Abstract

AbstractThe aim of this scoping review was to synthesize published studies and ongoing clinical trials of psychological interventions for mental health problems associated with COVID‐19 infection. The study protocol was developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) Extension for Scoping Reviews. We conducted systematic searches for studies published or registered between January 2020 and October 2022 using eight scientific databases and clinical trial registries, which identified 40 complete published studies and 53 ongoing clinical trials. We found that most studies were randomized controlled trials (74%) while the remaining used study designs of lower methodological quality. Most studies investigated interventions for acute COVID‐19 patients (74%) and others explored post‐COVID conditions (PCC) or recovered patients. Cognitive and behavioral therapies were the main intervention approaches (31%), followed by multidisciplinary programs (21%) and mindfulness (17%). The most frequently evaluated outcomes were anxiety (33%), depression (26%), quality of life (13%), and insomnia (10%). No studies on youths, older people, or marginalized communities were found. These findings summarize the burgeoning research on a range of psychological interventions for individuals infected with COVID‐19. However, the field is in its infancy and further research to develop an evidence base for targeted care is necessary. The gaps identified in the current study also highlight the need for more research on youths, older people, and members of marginalized communities, and PCC patients. It is important to ascertain interventions and delivery strategies that are not only effective and affordable but also allow high scalability and accessibility.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3