March Madness prediction: Different machine learning approaches with non‐box score statistics

Author:

Kim Jun Woo1ORCID,Magnusen Mar2,Jeong Seunghoon3

Affiliation:

1. School of Global Business Arcadia University Glenside Pennsylvania USA

2. Department of Educational Leadership Baylor University Waco Texas USA

3. Department of Taekwondo Woosuk University Jeollabuk‐do South Korea

Abstract

AbstractThe popularity of analytical research specializing in forecasting of March Madness saw an increase in the past decades. While the influence of nongame statistics on the game outcome has become a great interest in sports analytics, little research has focused on situational factors in predicting sports tournament outcomes. Therefore, this study is to examine the use of different machine learning algorithms, including artificial neural network (ANN), k‐nearest neighbors (kNN), support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression, and random forest (RF), to forecast the winning in a matchup between any two given teams during the March Madness tournaments. Our data include 1370 observations with 685 tournament games from 2006 to 2007 to 2016 to 2017 seasons. The results show that neural networks outperformed all other classifiers (67% of accuracy), followed by SVM (65%), kNN (63%), logistic regression (63%), and RF (61%).

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Management Science and Operations Research,Strategy and Management,Business and International Management

Reference63 articles.

1. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on HOME Advantage in Different European Professional Basketball Leagues

2. American Gaming Association. (2021).2021 March Madness wagering estimates.https://www.americangaming.org/resources/2021-march-madness-wagering-estimates/

3. Barrabi T.(2020).NCAA's March Madness coronavirus cancellation will cost organization big. Fox Business.https://www.foxbusiness.com/sports/coronavirus-ncaa-basketball-revenue-march-madness-impact

4. Barron J.(2022).St. Peter's: A Cinderella story that began in Jersey City. New York Times.https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/25/nyregion/st-peters-a-cinderella-story-that-began-in-jersey-city.html

5. A Comparative Analysis of Nonlinear Machine Learning Algorithms for Breast Cancer Detection

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3