Systemic therapy for Asian patients with advanced BRAF V600‐mutant melanoma in a real‐world setting: A multi‐center retrospective study in Japan (B‐CHECK‐RWD study)

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAnti‐PD‐1‐based immunotherapy is considered a preferred first‐line treatment for advanced BRAF V600‐mutant melanoma. However, a recent international multi‐center study suggested that the efficacy of immunotherapy is poorer in Asian patients in the non‐acral cutaneous subtype. We hypothesized that the optimal first‐line treatment for Asian patients may be different.MethodsWe retrospectively collected data of Asian patients with advanced BRAF V600‐mutant melanoma treated with first‐line BRAF/MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi), anti‐PD‐1 monotherapy (Anti‐PD‐1), and nivolumab plus ipilimumab (PD‐1/CTLA‐4) between 2016 and 2021 from 28 institutions in Japan.ResultsWe identified 336 patients treated with BRAF/MEKi (n = 236), Anti‐PD‐1 (n = 64) and PD‐1/CTLA‐4 (n = 36). The median follow‐up duration was 19.9 months for all patients and 28.6 months for the 184 pa tients who were alive at their last follow‐up. For patients treated with BRAF/MEKi, anti‐PD‐1, PD‐1/CTLA‐4, the median ages at baseline were 62, 62, and 53 years (p = 0.03); objective response rates were 69%, 27%, and 28% (p < 0.001); median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 14.7, 5.4, and 5.8 months (p = 0.003), and median overall survival (OS) was 34.6, 37.0 months, and not reached, respectively (p = 0.535). In multivariable analysis, hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS of Anti‐PD‐1 and PD‐1/CTLA‐4 compared with BRAF/MEKi were 2.30 (p < 0.001) and 1.38 (p = 0.147), and for OS, HRs were 1.37 (p = 0.111) and 0.56 (p = 0.075), respectively. In propensity‐score matching, BRAF/MEKi showed a tendency for longer PFS and equivalent OS with PD‐1/CTLA‐4 (HRs for PD‐1/CTLA‐4 were 1.78 [p = 0.149]) and 1.03 [p = 0.953], respectively). For patients who received second‐line treatment, BRAF/MEKi followed by PD‐1/CTLA‐4 showed poor survival outcomes.ConclusionsThe superiority of PD‐1/CTLA‐4 over BRAF/MEKi appears modest in Asian patients. First‐line BRAF/MEKi remains feasible, but it is difficult to salvage at progression. Ethnicity should be considered when selecting systemic therapies until personalized biomarkers are available in daily practice. Further studies are needed to establish the optimal treatment sequence for Asian patients.