Validation of an algorithm to identify fractures among patients within the Veterans Health Administration

Author:

Horton Thomas G.12,Richardson Tadarro L.12,Hackstadt Amber J.13,Halvorson Alese E.13,Hung Adriana M.12,Greevy Robert13,Roumie Christianne L.124ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Veteran Administration Tennessee Valley VA Health Care System Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center (GRECC) Nashville Tennessee USA

2. Department of Medicine Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA

3. Department of Biostatistics Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Nashville Tennessee USA

4. Department of Health Policy Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo validate an algorithm that identifies fractures using billing codes from the International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision (ICD‐9) and Tenth Revision (ICD‐10) for inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department visits in a population of patients.MethodsWe identified and reviewed a random sample of 543 encounters for adults receiving care within a single Veterans Health Administration healthcare system and had a first fracture episode between 2010 and 2019. To determine if an encounter represented a true incident fracture, we performed chart abstraction and assessed the type of fracture and mechanism. We calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) for the overall algorithm and each component diagnosis code along with 95% confidence intervals. Inverse probabilities of selection sampling weights were used to reflect the underlying study population.ResultsThe algorithm had an initial PPV of 73.5% (confidence interval [CI] 69.5, 77.1), with low performance when weighted to reflect the full population (PPV 66.3% [CI 58.8, 73.1]). The modified algorithm was restricted to diagnosis codes with PPVs > 50% and outpatient codes were restricted to the first outpatient position, with the exception of one high performing code. The resulting unweighted PPV improved to 90.1% (CI 86.2, 93.0) and weighted PPV of 91.3% (CI 86.8, 94.4). A confirmation sample demonstrated verified performance with PPV of 87.3% (76.0, 93.7). PPVs by location of care (inpatient, emergency department and outpatient) remained greater than 85% in the modified algorithm.ConclusionsThe modified algorithm, which included primary billing codes for inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department visits, demonstrated excellent PPV for identification of fractures among a cohort of patients within the Veterans Health Administration system.

Funder

Clinical Science Research and Development

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Epidemiology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3