Longitudinal outcome evaluations of Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Treatment programmes for patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review and meta‐analysis-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Longitudinal outcome evaluations of Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Treatment programmes for patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Published:2021-11-05 Issue:2 Volume:26 Page:310-335
ISSN:1090-3801
Container-title:European Journal of Pain
language:en
Short-container-title:European Journal of Pain

Author:

Elbers Stefan¹²^ORCID,Wittink Harriët¹^ORCID,Konings Sophie³^ORCID,Kaiser Ulrike⁴⁵^ORCID,Kleijnen Jos⁶,Pool Jan¹^ORCID,Köke Albère²⁷⁸^ORCID,Smeets Rob²⁹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Research group Lifestyle & Health Research Centre Healthy and Sustainable Living University of Applied Sciences Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands

2. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Research School CAPHRI Faculty of Health, Life Sciences and Medicine Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands

3. Department of Health Innovation and Technology Fontys University of Applied Sciences Eindhoven The Netherlands

4. Comprehensive Pain Center Medical Faculty Technical University Dresden Dresden Germany

5. University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden Dresden Germany

6. Department of Family Medicine Research School CAPHRI Faculty of Health, Life Sciences and Medicine Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands

7. Centre of Expertise in Pain and Rehabilitation Adelante, Maastricht The Netherlands

8. South University of Applied Sciences Heerlen The Netherlands

9. CIR Revalidatie Eindhoven The Netherlands

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ejp.1875

Reference124 articles.

1. Spouse-assisted training in pain coping skills and the outcome of multidisciplinary pain management for chronic low back pain treatment: A 1-year randomized controlled trial

2. Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials