Affiliation:
1. Department of Psychology University of Oslo Oslo Norway
2. Section for Trauma, Disasters and forced migration Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies Norway
Abstract
AbstractRorschach and self‐report instruments represent methodologically different types of assessment, which together may yield incremental information about the test‐taker. There is little evidence on whether and when results from these methods converge.ObjectiveTo examine possible convergences between Rorschach trauma‐related personality variables and self‐reported variables.MethodBefore and after psychotherapy 22 traumatized adult refugee patients were assessed with the Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R‐PAS), symptom checklists of posttraumatic stress, anxiety and depression, and a quality of life questionnaire. Correlational analyses between eight R‐PAS variables and 10 self‐reported variables were performed.ResultsThe findings showed inconsistent and nonsignificant correlations pretherapy. Posttherapy, however, all R‐PAS variables except Complexity correlated positively with symptoms of mental disorder, and negatively with the quality of life variables, as predicted. The R‐PAS variables Mutuality of Autonomy‐Pathology, Poor Human Representation, Critical Content, and Form Quality‐minus%, converged significantly with most of the self‐reported variables, with medium to large correlations.ConclusionThe finding of convergence only after psychotherapy, may tentatively suggest greater self‐knowledge and internal consistency through the therapy experience, and increased trust and self‐disclosure through the repeated meetings with the researchers. The findings represent a promising contribution to a cumulative validation process of convergence between Rorschach and self‐report data.
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Clinical Psychology
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献