Cognitive impairment in cervical cancer survivors—Exploring the discrepancy between subjective and objective assessment

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveCancer‐related cognitive impairment has severe implications for the quality of life and societal participation of cervical cancer survivors (CCS). However, there is no research on the association between subjective and objective cognitive impairment (CI) in cervical cancer. This cross‐sectional study aimed to examine the frequency and severity of objective CI in CCS reporting significant subjective CI and explore the discrepancy between subjective and objective CI.MethodsSixty‐five CCS reporting significant subjective CI, defined as 1.5 SD below the normative mean, underwent neuropsychological (NP) assessment covering attention, verbal memory, processing speed, verbal fluency, and executive functions. CCS were compared to healthy age‐matched controls (n = 74). A subjective versus objective discrepancy score was calculated based on the standardized scores within each group.ResultsThe CCS group performed significantly poorer across all NP tests compared to healthy controls (all p‐values <0.001) and 81.5% had scores below cut‐off as defined by the International Cognition and Cancer Task Force. However, compared to published normative data, most CCS performed within the clinically normal range. Processing speed and verbal memory were the most affected cognitive domains. By calculating a discrepancy score, both groups on average displayed a quite accurate concordance between subjective and objective cognitive functioning.ConclusionAlthough CI is evident in CCS, our results confirm that objective and subjective CI represent different constructs and highlight the limitations of normative data. Differentiating subjective and objective CI is important when tailoring effective interventions in the survivorship care of CCS.