Eligibility to COAPT trial in the daily practice: A real‐world experience

Author:

Zancanaro Edoardo1ORCID,Buzzatti Nicola1ORCID,Denti Paolo1,Guicciardi Nicolò Azzola1,Melillo Enrico2,Monaco Fabrizio3,Agricola Eustachio4,Ancona Francesco4,Alfieri Ottavio1,De Bonis Michele1,Maisano Francesco1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiac Surgery San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy

2. Department of Cardiology and Heart Failure Monaldi Hospital Naples Italy

3. Department of Cardiac Anesthesia San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy

4. Cardiovascular Imaging Unit San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe COAPT Trial was the first ever to demonstrate a survival benefit in treating functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). That was achieved through transcatheter mitral repair in selected patients. The exact proportion of patients fulfilling COAPT selection criteria in the real‐world is unknown.AimsTo assess the applicability of COAPT criteria in real world and its impact on patients’ survival.MethodsWe assessed the clinical data and follow‐up results of all consecutive patients admitted for FMR at our Department between January 2016 and May 2021 according to COAPT eligibility. COAPT eligibility was retrospectively assessed by a cardiac surgeon and a cardiologist.ResultsAmong 394 patients, 56 (14%) were COAPT eligible. The most frequent reasons for exclusion were MR ≤ 2 (22%), LVEF < 20% or >50% (19%), and non‐optimized GDMT (21.3%).Among Non‐COAPT patients, weighted 4‐year survival was higher in patients who received MitraClip compared to those who were left in optimized medical therapy (91.5% confidence interval [CI: 0.864, 0.96] vs. 71.8% [CI: 0.509, 0.926], respectively, p = 0.027).ConclusionsOnly a minority (14%) of real‐world patients with FMR referred to a tertiary hospital fulfilled the COAPT selection criteria. Among Non‐COAPT patients, weighted 4‐year survival was higher in patients who received MitraClip compared to those who were left in optimized medical therapy (91.5% [0.864, 0.96] vs. 71.8% [0.509, 0.926], respectively, p = 0.027).

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3