Affiliation:
1. Metrology Research Centre National Research Council Canada Ottawa Ontario Canada
2. Department of Physics Carleton University Ottawa Ontario Canada
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundElectron synchrotrons produce x‐ray beams with dose rates orders of magnitude greater than conventional x‐ray tubes and with beam sizes on the order of a few millimeters. These characteristics put severe challenges on current dosimeters to accurately realize absorbed dose or air kerma.PurposeThis work seeks to investigate the suitability of a novel aluminum‐based calorimeter to determine absorbed dose to water with an uncertainty significantly smaller than currently possible with conventional detectors. A lower uncertainty in the determination of absolute dose rate would impact both therapeutic applications of synchrotron‐produced x‐ray beams and research investigations.MethodsA vacuum‐based calorimeter prototype with an aluminum core was built, matching the beam profile of the 140 keV monochromatic x‐ray beam, produced by the Canadian Light Source Biomedical Imaging and Therapy beamline. The choice of material and overall calorimeter design was optimized using FEM thermal modeling software while Monte Carlo radiation transport simulations were used to model the impact of interactions of the radiation beam with the detector components.ResultsCorrections for both the thermal conduction and radiation transport effects were of the order of 3% and the simplicity of the geometry, combined with the monochromatic nature of the incident x‐ray beam, meant that the uncertainty in each correction was ≤0.5%. The calorimeter performance was found to be repeatable over multiple irradiations of 1 Gy at the ± 0.6% level, and no systematic dependence on environmental effects or total dose was observed.ConclusionThe combined standard uncertainty in the determination of absorbed dose to aluminum was estimated to be 0.8%, indicating that absorbed dose to water, the ultimate quantity of interest, could be determined with an uncertainty on the order of 1%. This value is an improvement over current techniques used for synchrotron dosimetry and comparable with the state‐of‐the art for conventional kV x‐ray dosimetry.