NDIS partnership working? Paradoxes, contested spaces and aspirations of disability leaders, family carers and disability services

Author:

David Christina1ORCID,Johnson Belinda1,Ramcharan Paul12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Social and Global Studies Centre RMIT University Melbourne Victoria Australia

2. School of Social and Political Sciences University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractIn 2022, a new Federal Labor government introduced an NDIA Act amendment and initiatives that indicate a reorientation to partnership working and integration of co‐design principles. “Partnership working” reflects collaborative aspirations where parties commit to trust, shared goals and respect for diverse knowledges and experiences. The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) espouses a partnership approach and rights‐based values, yet the neoliberal emphasis on individual choice and marketisation within a social insurance model can privilege certain voices and produce adversarial processes and dynamics. Our focus group research with disability leaders, family carers and disability service professionals explored experiences in the NDIS planning phase with a focus on the extent to which partnership principles operated in practice. Our findings suggest embedded paradoxes; time and resources are required to build the trust and relationships central to interpersonal partnerships between individuals, carers and services but are undermined by organisational and structural factors such as workload pressures, administrative burden and adversarial practices produced in a cost containment context. Tensions in partnership working must also negotiate carers' workload and responsibilities with the autonomy of people with disability. We argue that partnership working is difficult to achieve where structural and systemic limitations and assumptions influence everyday practices. Partnership must operate from empowerment and relational, rather than transactional, principles if genuine participatory and inclusive practice is to be achieved.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference36 articles.

1. Cross-Sector Partnerships in Human Services: Insights and Organizational Dilemmas

2. Autism Aspergers Advocacy Australia. (2022)NDIS appeals at the administrative appeals tribunal. Available from:https://a4.org.au/node/2445[Accessed 9th October 2022].

3. Parent experience of the national disability insurance scheme (NDIS) for children with hearing loss in Australia

4. Carers Australia. (2019)Statistics – Carers Australia. Available from:http://www.carersaustralia.com.au/about‐carers/statistics/[Accessed 19th July 2022].

5. When to Use Focus Groups

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3