Affiliation:
1. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry University of Notre Dame Notre Dame Indiana USA
2. Eck Institute for Global Health University of Notre Dame Notre Dame Indiana USA
3. Department of Earth Sciences Indiana University Indianapolis Indianapolis Indiana USA
4. Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Notre Dame Notre Dame Indiana USA
5. Lucy Family Institute for Data Science and Society University of Notre Dame Notre Dame Indiana USA
Abstract
AbstractThe main sources of lead exposure for children occur in the home environment, yet no low‐cost analytical methods exist to screen homes for lead hazards. Previously, an inexpensive (~$20), quantitative lead screening kit was developed in which residents collect soil, paint, and dust samples that are returned to a laboratory for lead analysis using X‐ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF). This screening kit was initially validated in 2020; it was determined that in situ and ex situ XRF lead measurements on the same samples exhibited strong sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. As a follow‐up to the initial validation, an implementation study and further statistical analyses were conducted. Correlation analysis using the results from nearly 400 screening kits identified an overall lack of correlation between sample types, reinforcing the utility of all eight sample locations. Principal component analysis searched for underlying correlations in sample types and provided evidence that both interior and exterior paint are major sources of lead hazards for Indiana homes. The implementation study compared the results of the government‐standard lead inspection and risk assessment (LIRA) and the lead screening kit in 107 Indiana homes. In the United States, the LIRA is a thorough inspection of paint, dust, and soil that is usually state mandated in response to a child's elevated blood level and is used to identify where remediation efforts should be focused. The lead screening kit and LIRA agreed on the presence of lead in 79 of the 107 homes tested (74%). Discrepancies in agreement are likely the result of differences in the sample location and number of samples collected by each method. Overall, these results suggest that the lead screening kit is an acceptable resource that could be used to expand the services health departments provide for lead prevention. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:1504–1513. © 2024 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
Funder
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Reference28 articles.
1. Statement on Childhood Lead Poisoning
2. Inconsistent screening for lead endangers vulnerable children: policy lessons from South Bend and Saint Joseph County, Indiana, USA
3. Census Bureau. (2023 December 7).American community survey 5‐year aggregates 2009–2022.https://www.census.gov/data/developers/data-sets/acs-5year.html
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2000 February).Eliminating childhood lead poisoning: A federal strategy targeting lead paint hazards.https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/lead/about/fedstrategy2000.pdf
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012 4 January).Low level lead exposure harms children: A renewed call of primary prevention.https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/lead/acclpp/final_document_010412.pdf