Low‐dose gemcitabine plus nab‐paclitaxel versus standard‐dose gemcitabine plus nab‐paclitaxel in elderly patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: A randomized Phase II trial

Author:

Kamata Ken1ORCID,Imai Hajime2,Matsumoto Hisakazu3,Yamashita Yukitaka3,Kato Takao4,Nishi Katsuhisa4,Omoto Shunsuke1ORCID,Minaga Kosuke1ORCID,Yamao Kentaro1,Hyodo Tomoko5,Im Sung‐Woon5,Hara Akane1,Yoshikawa Tomoe1,Ishikawa Rei1,Okamoto Ayana1,Yamazaki Tomohiro1,Nakai Atsushi1,Ueshima Kazuomi1,Chiba Yasutaka6,Takenaka Mamoru1,Watanabe Tomohiro1ORCID,Kitano Masayuki7ORCID,Kudo Masatoshi1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Kindai University Faculty of Medicine Osaka Japan

2. Department of Gastroenterology Okanami General Hospital Mie Japan

3. Department of Gastroenterology Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center Wakayama Japan

4. Department of Gastroenterology Hyogo Prefectural Awaji Medical Center Hyogo Japan

5. Department of Radiology Kindai University Faculty of Medicine Osaka‐Sayama Japan

6. Clinical Research Center Kindai University Hospital Osaka Japan

7. Second Department of Internal Medicine Wakayama Medical University School of Medicine Wakayama Japan

Abstract

AbstractBackground and AimA multicenter, open‐label randomized Phase II trial was conducted to determine whether low‐dose gemcitabine plus nab‐paclitaxel (GnP) could improve tolerability and show equivalent efficacy to the standard‐dose GnP for elderly patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.MethodsConsecutive patients aged ≥65 years with metastatic pancreatic cancer who presented at one of four Japanese referral centers between November 2016 and January 2021 were enrolled. The 60 patients were randomly assigned to low‐ or standard‐dose groups with a 1:1 ratio. Patients in the low‐dose GnP group received gemcitabine at a dose of 250 mg/m2 and nab‐paclitaxel at 125 mg/m2.ResultsLow‐dose GnP significantly decreased the rate of cases requiring dose reduction (16.7% vs 63.3%). The response rate (36.7% vs 33.3%) and progression‐free survival (7.3 vs 8 months) were comparable between the low‐ and standard‐dose groups as determined by independent review. The difference in the median overall survival between the two groups was not significant (7.9 vs 12 months). The proportion of patients with hematologic and non‐hematologic treatment‐related adverse events was comparable between the two groups.ConclusionLow‐dose GnP had an equivalent efficacy to conventional therapy; however, it did not reduce adverse events.

Funder

Japan Research Foundation for Clinical Pharmacology

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Gastroenterology,Hepatology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3