Mitigation of impacts of cattle access on stream ecosystems: Efficacy of fencing

Author:

O'Sullivan M.1,Ó hUallacháin D.2,Antunes P. O.3,Jennings E.3,Linnane Suzanne3,Wynne Caroline3ORCID,Kelly‐Quinn M.14

Affiliation:

1. School of Biology and Environmental Science, Freshwater Ecology Research Group University College Dublin Dublin Ireland

2. Environment, Soils and Land Use Department Teagasc, Johnstown Castle Research Centre Wexford Ireland

3. Centre for Freshwater and Environmental Studies Dundalk Institute of Technology Dundalk Ireland

4. UCD Earth Institute Dublin Ireland

Abstract

AbstractHeadwater streams can constitute up to 80% of river channel length and are vulnerable to anthropogenic pressures due to their high connectivity to adjacent land, large relative catchment size and low dilution capacity. In these environments, unrestricted cattle access is a potentially significant cause of water quality deterioration, resulting from increases in stream bank erosion, riparian damage and sediment deposition among others. Several studies have reported improvements in the physico‐chemical and hydromorphological conditions of streams following the elimination of cattle access; few, however, have focussed on the ecological impacts of such management practices. Here, such impacts are assessed. The study explores the short‐term effects of cattle exclusion by comparing habitat conditions, sediment deposition and instream macroinvertebrate communities upstream and downstream of cattle access points prior to, and 1 year following exclusion via fencing. The long‐term effects are also measured by reassessing a small stream catchment entirely fenced off from cattle access in 2008 under a dedicated management plan. In the short term, cattle exclusion led to a reduction in deposited sediment downstream of cattle access points and a related homogenisation of macroinvertebrate community structure between upstream and downstream of cattle access points. Increased abundances of specific indicator taxa (Ancylus fluviatilis, Glossosomatidae and Elmidae) in the fenced catchment following 9 years of exclusion highlight the long‐term ecological benefits of such mitigation practices. These findings highlight the importance of incentivised agri‐environment measures in reducing the negative impacts of cattle access to vulnerable aquatic ecosystems.

Funder

Environmental Protection Agency

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Environmental Science,Water Science and Technology,Environmental Chemistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3