A guide to successful management of collaborative partnerships in quantitative research: An illustration of the science of team science

Author:

Platt Alyssa1ORCID,Truong Tracy1ORCID,Boulos Mary2,Carlson Nichole E.3ORCID,Desai Manisha2ORCID,Elam Monica M.1,Slade Emily4ORCID,Hanlon Alexandra L.5ORCID,Hurst Jillian H.6ORCID,Olsen Maren K.17,Poisson Laila M.8ORCID,Rende Lacey1ORCID,Pomann Gina‐Maria1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USA

2. Quantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Palo Alto California USA

3. Department of Biostatistics and Informatics Colorado School of Public Health Aurora Colorado USA

4. Department of Biostatistics University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky USA

5. Center for Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Department of Statistics Virginia Tech Roanoke Virginia USA

6. Department of Pediatrics Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USA

7. Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation Durham VA Medical Center Durham North Carolina USA

8. Department of Public Health Sciences Henry Ford Health + Michigan State University Health Sciences Detroit Michigan USA

Abstract

Data‐intensive research continues to expand with the goal of improving healthcare delivery, clinical decision‐making, and patient outcomes. Quantitative scientists, such as biostatisticians, epidemiologists, and informaticists, are tasked with turning data into health knowledge. In academic health centres, quantitative scientists are critical to the missions of biomedical discovery and improvement of health. Many academic health centres have developed centralized Quantitative Science Units which foster dual goals of professional development of quantitative scientists and producing high quality, reproducible domain research. Such units then develop teams of quantitative scientists who can collaborate with researchers. However, existing literature does not provide guidance on how such teams are formed or how to manage and sustain them. Leaders of Quantitative Science Units across six institutions formed a working group to examine common practices and tools that can serve as best practices for Quantitative Science Units that wish to achieve these dual goals through building long‐term partnerships with researchers. The results of this working group are presented to provide tools and guidance for Quantitative Science Units challenged with developing, managing, and evaluating Quantitative Science Teams. This guidance aims to help Quantitative Science Units effectively participate in and enhance the research that is conducted throughout the academic health centre—shaping their resources to fit evolving research needs.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3