What Matters to Employment Attorneys When Considering Online or In‐Person Mediation?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

What Matters to Employment Attorneys When Considering Online or In‐Person Mediation?

Published:2023-10-27 Issue:10 Volume:41 Page:151-158
ISSN:1549-4373
Container-title:Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation
language:en
Short-container-title:Alt High Cost Litig

Author:

Eisenberg Deborah Thompson,Shestowsky Donna,Niccolini Robert R.

Abstract

During the pandemic, most mediations pivoted to online videoconferencing platforms (Gealy et al., 2021; Golann, 2021—all citations appear in full in the References and Resources box at the end of the article). Post‐pandemic, parties have the freedom to choose between in‐person and online mediation. Research that can inform decisions about mediation format has not kept pace with the meteoric rise in online mediation. While mediators and participants have shared impressions (and some, enthusiasm) about their experiences with online mediation during the pandemic (Franklin, 2021; Paulson, 2021), we need additional research examining whether and how mediation format affects the process and outcome of mediation.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/alt.22020

Reference18 articles.

1. “ADR is not a household term: Considering the ethical and practical consequences of the public's lack of understanding of mediation and arbitration,”;Blankley Kristen M.;Nebraska Law Rev.

2. “Workplace mediation: An underdeveloped research area,”;Bollen Katalien;Negotiation Journal

3. “EEOC Survey Reports: Online Mediation Works. Online Mediation Is Better?”;Chan Mylene;Alternatives

4. “ADR in a virtual world: Here today and likely for the foreseeable future,”;Franklin Cassandra S.;ADR Times

5. “Panel discussion: Mediation in the age of COVID and beyond,”;Gealy Stephen;Creighton Law Review