Disparity in Guideline‐Based Antidiabetic Drugs Prescribing for Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Primary Healthcare Facilities Across China, 2017–2019

Author:

Fu Mengyuan12ORCID,Gong Zhiwen1,Zhu Yuezhen1,Li Can1,Li Huangqianyu2,Shi Luwen12ORCID,Guan Xiaodong12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences Peking University Beijing China

2. International Research Center for Medicinal Administration Peking University Beijing China

Abstract

ABSTRACTPurposeThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the pattern, appropriateness, and cost of antidiabetic drugs prescribed for patients with Type 2 diabetes at primary healthcare facilities (PHFs) in China.MethodsWe collected outpatient‐visit prescriptions from 363 PHFs in 31 cities covering eastern, central, and western regions of China. The visits of adult patients with Type 2 diabetes diagnosis were collected and classified the antidiabetic medication pattern of each patient use as recommended or non‐recommended according to Chinese guidelines. We then calculated the proportion of guideline‐recommended patterns and the average monthly cost for each pattern, overall and by region.ResultsOf 33 519 prescriptions for Type 2 diabetes, most (73.9%) were for guideline‐recommended antidiabetic treatments. The proportion of guideline‐recommended prescriptions varied by region (eastern [75.9%], central [87.5%], and western [59.7%]). Metformin monotherapy was the most common guideline‐recommended treatment in all three regions (eastern [20.1%], central [28.0%], and western [24.6%]). The most common non‐guideline‐recommended treatments were monotherapy of insulin (eastern [16.5%], central [5.1%], and western [25.7%]) and traditional Chinese antidiabetic medicines (eastern [5.6%], central [5.7%], and western [11.1%]). The average monthly costs were lower for guideline‐recommended treatments compared to non‐recommended treatments in all regions (eastern [13.6 ± 15.4 USD vs. 28.1 ± 22.0 USD], central [9.8 ± 10.9 USD vs. 28.7 ± 19.4 USD], and western [17.9 ± 21.4 USD vs. 30.3 ± 23.6 USD]).ConclusionsThe majority of patients with Type 2 diabetes received guideline‐recommended antidiabetic medications at PHFs in China, with only half of the prescriptions containing guideline‐recommended metformin. Utilization of guideline‐recommended therapies differed across regions. Tailored interventions to promote evidence‐based antidiabetic prescribing are urgently needed, especially in the undeveloped western region.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Wiley

Reference39 articles.

1. Introduction: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022

2. Guideline for the Prevention and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in China (2020 Edition);Diabetes Branch of Chinese Medical Association;Chinese Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism,2021

3. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treatment Patterns Across Europe: A Population-based Multi-database Study

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3