Biaxial bending of RC rectangular column sections: Improved ‘load contour’ formulation

Author:

Kolapkar Bhargav Narendra1,Balakrishnan Bijily2ORCID,Menon Devdas3

Affiliation:

1. Godrej Properties Limited Mumbai India

2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, IIT Tirupati Tirupati India

3. Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Madras Chennai India

Abstract

AbstractIn design practice, the safety of any given rectangular reinforced concrete column section is checked by ensuring that all possible combinations of axial compression (Pu) and biaxial moments (Mux, Muy) at the ultimate limit state lie within its three‐dimensional load–moment interaction failure surface. Although such a check is facilitated by commercial software packages, it is traditionally carried out with the help of an approximate formulation of the ‘load contour’ at any given axial load level, first proposed by Bresler. The present study proposes an efficient algorithm, using a ‘modified thick layer integration’ approach and a ‘nested bisection’ method, to generate the ‘exact’ load contour (and thereby, the complete interaction surface) for any symmetrically reinforced column section, complying with the strength design requirements of ACI 318 (or EC2 or IS 456). The algorithm also generates a measure of the safety margin, called ‘demand‐to‐capacity ratio’ (DCR), defined as the ratio of the resultant design moment (Mu) to the moment capacity (Muθ) at a given axial load level (Pu). For an optimal code‐compliant design, the peak value of DCR generated from various factored load combinations (obtained from frame analyses) must be close to 1.0. The extent to which the peak DCR is less (or greater) than 1.0 provides a measure of over‐design (or under‐design) in a given context. After validating the algorithm, a parametric study was carried out on a spectrum of 36 different cross‐sections having different aspect ratios, bar arrangements and reinforcement percentages. The study reveals that the exponent in the approximate load contour formulation depends not only on the axial load (as currently assumed in ACI: SP17, EC2 and IS 456), but also on the percentage of longitudinal reinforcement. Accordingly, modifications have been suggested to improve the accuracy in these code‐prescribed approximate formulations of the load contour, for more economical and safe design.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Mechanics of Materials,General Materials Science,Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference20 articles.

1. Seismic response of three-dimensional r/c multi-storey frame building under uni- and bi-directional input ground motion

2. RC rectangular column sections under biaxial eccentric compression – an improved design recommendation;Srinivasan S;J Struct Eng,2003

3. Biaxial failure and axial load interactions in short rectangular reinforced concrete columns;Row DG;Bull NZ Soc Earthquake Eng,1973

4. Capacity of rectangular cross sections under biaxially eccentric loads;Cedolin L;ACI Struct J,2008

5. Arbitrarily shaped reinforced concrete members subject to biaxial bending and axial load

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3