Assessment of Hidden Blood Loss in Spinal Metastasis Surgery: A Comprehensive Approach with MRI‐Based Radiomics Models

Abstract

BackgroundPatients undergoing surgery for spinal metastasis are predisposed to hidden blood loss (HBL), which is associated with poor surgical outcomes but unpredictable.PurposeTo evaluate the role of MRI‐based radiomics models for assess the risk of HBL in patients undergoing spinal metastasis surgery.Study TypeRetrospective.Subjects202 patients (42.6% female) operated on for spinal metastasis with a mean age of 58 ± 11 years were divided into a training (n = 162) and a validation cohort (n = 40).Field Strength/Sequence1.5T or 3.0T scanners. Sagittal T1‐weighted and fat‐suppressed T2‐weighted imaging sequences.AssessmentHBL was calculated using the Gross formula. Patients were classified as low and high HBL group, with 1000 mL as the threshold. Radiomics models were constructed with radiomics features. The radiomics score (Radscore) was obtained from the optimal radiomics model. Clinical variables were accessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Independent risk variables were used to build a clinical model. Clinical variables combined with Radscore were used to establish a combined model.Statistical TestsPredictive performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score. Calibration curves and decision curves analyses were produced to evaluate the accuracy and clinical utility.ResultsAmong the radiomics models, the fusion (T1WI + FS‐T2WI) model demonstrated the highest predictive efficacy (AUC: 0.744, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.576–0.914). The Radscore model (AUC: 0.809, 95% CI: 0.664–0.954) performs slightly better than the clinical model (AUC: 0.721, 95% CI: 0.524–0.918; P = 0.418) and the combined model (AUC: 0.752, 95% CI: 0.593–0.911; P = 0.178).Data ConclusionA radiomics model may serve as a promising assessment tool for the risk of HBL in patients undergoing spinal metastasis surgery, and guide perioperative planning to improve surgical outcomes.Level of Evidence3Technical EfficacyStage 2