Clinical significance of prospectively assigned Gleason tertiary pattern 4 in contemporary Gleason score 3+3=6 prostate cancer-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Clinical significance of prospectively assigned Gleason tertiary pattern 4 in contemporary Gleason score 3+3=6 prostate cancer

Published:2016-02-16 Issue:8 Volume:76 Page:715-721
ISSN:0270-4137
Container-title:The Prostate
language:en
Short-container-title:Prostate

Author:

Doshi Chirag¹,Vacchio Michael¹,Attwood Kristopher²,Murekeyisoni Christine¹,Mehedint Diana C.¹,Badkhshan Shervin¹,Azabdaftari Gissou³,Sule Norbert³,Guru Khurshid A.¹⁴,Mohler James L.¹⁴,Kauffman Eric C.¹⁴⁵

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Buffalo New York

2. Department of Biostatistics; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Buffalo New York

3. Department of Pathology; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Buffalo New York

4. Department of Urology; University of Buffalo; Buffalo New York

5. Department of Cancer Genetics; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Buffalo New York

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Urology,Oncology

Reference31 articles.

1. Classification of prostatic carcinomas;Gleason;Cancer Chemother Rep,1966

2. Prostate cancer, version 2.2014;Mohler;J Natl Compr Canc Netw,2014

3. Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: Data based on the modified Gleason scoring system;Pierorazio;BJU Int,2013

4. A report of the workshops on the current status of the histologic grading of prostate cancer;Murphy;Cancer,1979

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Variance of Tumor Grade at Radical Prostatectomy With Assessment of Each Tumor Nodule Versus Global Grading;Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine;2021-11-09

2. Prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason pattern in the contemporary era of Gleason grade grouping: A narrative review;International Journal of Urology;2021-02-12

3. Clinical proteomics for prostate cancer: understanding prostate cancer pathology and protein biomarkers for improved disease management;Clinical Proteomics;2020-11-20

4. Clinical outcome comparison of Grade Group 1 and Grade Group 2 prostate cancer with and without cribriform architecture at the time of radical prostatectomy;Histopathology;2020-04

5. Feasibility and continence outcomes of extended prostatic urethral preservation during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy;Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases;2019-11-07