Variation in global uptake of the Surgical Safety Checklist

Author:

Delisle M12ORCID,Pradarelli J C13,Panda N14,Koritsanszky L15,Sonnay Y1,Lipsitz S1,Pearse R6,Harrison E M7,Biccard B8ORCID,Weiser T G597,Haynes A B14

Affiliation:

1. Safe Surgery Program, Ariadne Labs, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

2. Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

3. Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

4. Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

5. Lifebox, Brooklyn, New York, USA

6. William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London and Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK

7. Department of Clinical Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh, UK

8. Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Cape Town and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa

9. Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background The Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) is a patient safety tool shown to reduce mortality and to improve teamwork and adherence with perioperative safety practices. The results of the original pilot work were published 10 years ago. This study aimed to determine the contemporary prevalence and predictors of SSC use globally. Methods Pooled data from the GlobalSurg and Surgical Outcomes studies were analysed to describe SSC use in 2014–2016. The primary exposure was the Human Development Index (HDI) of the reporting country, and the primary outcome was reported SSC use. A generalized estimating equation, clustering by facility, was used to determine differences in SSC use by patient, facility and national characteristics. Results A total of 85 957 patients from 1464 facilities in 94 countries were included. On average, facilities used the SSC in 75·4 per cent of operations. Compared with very high HDI, SSC use was less in low HDI countries (odds ratio (OR) 0·08, 95 per cent c.i. 0·05 to 0·12). The SSC was used less in urgent compared with elective operations in low HDI countries (OR 0·68, 0·53 to 0·86), but used equally for urgent and elective operations in very high HDI countries (OR 0·96, 0·87 to 1·06). SSC use was lower for obstetrics and gynaecology versus abdominal surgery (OR 0·91, 0·85 to 0·98) and where the common or official language was not one of the WHO official languages (OR 0·30, 0·23 to 0·39). Conclusion Worldwide, SSC use is generally high, but significant variability exists. Implementation and dissemination strategies must be developed to address this variability.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3