Patient Perceptions of Rheumatoid Arthritis Blood Work: A Cross‐Sectional Survey in the ArthritisPower Registry

Author:

Nowell William B.1ORCID,Venkatachalam Shilpa1ORCID,Gavigan Kelly1ORCID,George Michael D.2ORCID,Withers Johanna B.3ORCID,Stradford Laura1ORCID,Rivera Esteban1ORCID,Curtis Jeffrey R.4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Global Healthy Living Foundation Upper Nyack New York

2. University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia

3. Scipher Medicine Corporation Waltham Massachusetts

4. University of Alabama at Birmingham and the Foundation for Advancing Science, Technology, Education and Research Birmingham

Abstract

ObjectiveTo examine how patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) perceive RA‐related laboratory testing and the potential utility of a blood test to predict treatment response to a new RA medication.MethodsArthritisPower members with RA were invited to participate in a cross‐sectional survey on reasons for laboratory testing plus a choice‐based conjoint analysis exercise to determine how patients value different attributes of a biomarker‐based test to predict treatment response.ResultsMost patients perceived that their doctors ordered laboratory tests to check for active inflammation (85.9%) or assess medication side effects (81.2%). The most commonly ordered blood tests used to monitor RA were complete blood counts, liver function tests, and those measuring C‐reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Patients felt CRP was most helpful in understanding their disease activity. Most worried their current RA medication would eventually stop working (91.4%) and they would waste time trying a new RA medication that may not work for them (81.7%). For patients who would require a future change in RA treatment, a majority (89.2%) reported that they would be very/extremely interested in a blood test that could help predict whether such new medication would be effective. Highly accurate test results (improving the chance RA medication will work from 50% to 85–95%) were more important to patients than low out‐of‐pocket cost (<$20) or minimal wait time (<7 days).ConclusionsPatients consider RA‐related blood work important for monitoring of inflammation and medication side effects. They worry about treatment effectiveness and would undergo testing to accurately predict treatment response.

Funder

The National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Rheumatology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3