Selecting a birth weight standard for an indigenous population in a LMIC: A prospective comparative study

Author:

Geerts Lut1ORCID,Brink Lucy T.1ORCID,Odendaal Hein J.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Stellenbosch University Parow South Africa

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThe aim of the present study was to compare birth weight (BW) distribution and proportion of BWs below or above specified percentiles in low‐risk singleton pregnancies in healthy South African (SA) women of mixed ancestry with expected values according to four BW references and to determine the physiological factors affecting BW.MethodsThis was an ancillary study of a prospective multinational cohort study, involving 7060 women recruited between August 2007 and January 2015 in two townships of Cape Town, characterized by low socioeconomic status, and high levels of drinking and smoking. Detailed information about maternal and pregnancy characteristics, including harmful exposures, was gathered prospectively, allowing us to select healthy women with uncomplicated pregnancies without any known harmful exposures. In this cohort we compared the median BW and the proportion of BWs <P3, 5 and 10 or >P90, 95 and 97 according to four reference standards (INTERGROWTH‐21st, customized according to the method described by Mickolajczyk, Fetal Medicine Foundation and revised Fenton reference) with expected values. Appropriate parametric and nonparametric tests were used, and sensitivity analysis was performed for infant sex, first trimester bookings and women of normal body mass index (BMI). Multiple regression was used to explore effects of confounders. Written consent and ethics approval was obtained.ResultsThe cohort included 739 infants. The INTERGROWTH‐21st standard was closest for the actual BW‐distribution and categories. Below‐expected BW was associated with boys, younger, shorter, leaner women, lower parity and gravidity. Actual BW was significantly influenced by maternal weight, BMI, parity and gestational age.ConclusionOf the four references assessed in this study, the INTERGROWTH‐21st standard was closest for the actual BW distribution. Maternal variables significantly influence BW.

Funder

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3