Molecular‐derived risk of malignancy and the related positive call rate of indeterminate thyroid cytology diagnoses as quality metrics for individual cytopathologists

Author:

Ohori N. Paul1ORCID,Cuda Jacqueline M.1,Bastacky Sheldon I.1,Yip Linwah2,Karslioglu‐French Esra3,Morariu Elena M.3,Ullal Jagdeesh3,Ramonell Kimberly M.2,Carty Sally E.2,Nikiforov Yuri E.1ORCID,Schoedel Karen E.1,Seethala Raja R.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pathology University of Pittsburgh Medical Center‐Presbyterian Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

2. Division of Endocrine Surgery University of Pittsburgh Medical Center‐Presbyterian Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

3. Division of Endocrinology University of Pittsburgh Medical Center‐Presbyterian Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIndeterminate thyroid cytopathology diagnoses represent differing degrees of risk that are corroborated by follow‐up studies. However, traditional cytologic–histologic correlation may overestimate the risk of malignancy (ROM) because only a subset of cases undergo resection. Alternatively, some molecular tests provide probability of malignancy data to calculate the molecular‐derived risk of malignancy (MDROM) and the positive call rate (PCR). The authors investigated MDROMs and PCRs of indeterminate diagnoses for individual cytopathologists as quality metrics.MethodsThis study was approved by the Department of Pathology Quality Improvement Program. Thyroid cytopathology diagnoses and ThyroSeq v3 results were retrieved for each cytopathologist for a 2‐year period with at least 3 years of follow‐up for the atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), follicular neoplasia (FN), and follicular neoplasia, oncocytic‐type (ONC) cytopathologic diagnoses. MDROMs and PCRs were compared with reference ROMs and cytologic–histologic correlation outcomes.ResultsThe overall MDROMs (and ranges for cytopathologists) for the AUS, FN, and ONC categories were 13.4% (range, 5.8%–20.8%), 28.1% (range, 22.1%–36.7%), and 27.0% (range, 19.5%–41.5%), respectively, and most individual cytopathologists' MDROMs were within reference ROM ranges. However, PCRs more effectively parsed the differences in cytopathologists' ROM performance. Although the overall PCRs were not significantly different across cytopathologists (p = .06), the AUS PCRs were quite different (p = .002). By cytologic–histologic correlation, six of 55 resected cases (10.9%) were falsely negative, and there were no false‐positive cases.ConclusionsMDROMs and PCRs evaluate concordance with reference ROMs and with one another and provide individual feedback, which potentially facilitates quality improvement.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3