Measuring board diversity: A systematic literature review of data sources, constructs, pitfalls, and suggestions for future research

Author:

Behlau Hendrik1,Wobst Janice1ORCID,Lueg Rainer12

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Management, Accounting and Finance Leuphana University Lüneburg Lüneburg Germany

2. Department of Economics University of Southern Denmark Kolding Denmark

Abstract

AbstractThe purpose of this systematic literature review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the methods used to measure board diversity. We develop a framework to structure empirical studies and develop an agenda for future research. We selected 61 empirical articles from an initial sample of 1035. This study discusses the different data collection methods. We group director and board attributes into the constructs of structural, demographic, and cognitive diversity. We identify four different approaches to combining and measuring diversity: non‐index, single‐index, cross‐indices, and inter‐indices. We find that measuring board diversity requires a mixture of archival and primary research, as well as various methods such as applying indices, constructing heterogeneity scores, and using machine learning approaches to infer directors' attributes. We contribute to research by providing a framework that structures measuring techniques for board diversity, a future research agenda, and insights on potential window‐dressing.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Strategy and Management,Development

Reference115 articles.

1. Board Diversity: Moving the Field Forward

2. Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance☆

3. Board diversity and firm performance: The role of business group affiliation

4. Statistical Analysis of Qualitative Variation

5. AJG. (2021).Academic Journal Guide – Methodology. Retrieved fromhttps://charteredabs.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Academic_Journal_Guide_2021-Methodology.pdf

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3