Affiliation:
1. ‘Niculae Stancioiu’ Heart Institute University of Medicine and Pharmacy ‘Iuliu Hatieganu’ Cluj‐Napoca Romania
2. Klinik für Kardiologie Medizinische Universitätsklinik Liestal Switzerland
3. University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland
Abstract
AbstractPercutaneous and surgical therapies for septal reduction for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy have been going head‐to‐head for the past 20 years with similar outcomes and mortality rates, although contemporary myectomy seems to materialize its superiority. However, on closer analysis, the external validity of studies advocating myectomy does not translate to all centres. The aim of this review was to examine the most recent data on septal reduction therapy and to attempt to phenotype the appropriate patient for each of the two treatments. The key to similar low mortality rates between ventricular septal myectomy and alcohol septal ablation appears to be proper patient selection performed in high volume clinical environments. Furthermore, we analyse the role of mavacampten (the recently approved cardiac myosin inhibitor) in replacing or complementing the two septal reduction therapies.
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献