Finding a needle in a haystack: The identification of clinical practice guidelines for psychosocial oncology through an environmental scan of the academic and gray literature

Author:

Bergeron Catherine1ORCID,Azzi Michelle1,Coroiu Adina2,Loiselle Carmen G.34,Drapeau Martin1,Körner Annett14567ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada

2. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Toronto Ontario Canada

3. Ingram School of Nursing McGill University Montreal Canada

4. Department of Oncology McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada

5. Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital Montreal Quebec Canada

6. Louise Granofsky Psychosocial Oncology Program, Segal Cancer Centre Montreal Quebec Canada

7. Psychosocial Oncology Program McGill University Health Centre Montreal Quebec Canada

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveClinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are evidence‐based tools well‐suited to translate the latest research evidence into recommendations for routine clinical care. Given the rapid expansion of psychosocial oncology research, they represent a key opportunity for informing the treatment decisions of overburdened clinicians, standardizing service delivery, and improving patient‐reported outcomes. Yet, there is little consensus on how clinicians can most effectively access these tools and little to no information on the current availability and scope of CPGs for the range of psychosocial symptoms and concerns experienced by patients with cancer.MethodOur environmental scan consisted of an academic and gray literature designed to identify currently available CPGs addressing a range of cancer‐related psychosocial symptoms.ResultsFindings revealed a total of 23 existing psychosocial oncology CPGs that met full eligibility criteria. The gray literature search was found to be more effective at identifying CPGs (n = 22) compared to the academic search (n = 9).ConclusionSeveral concerns arose from the systematic search. The limited publication of CPGs in peer‐reviewed journals may make clinicians and stakeholders more hesitant to implement CPGs due to uncertainties about the methodological rigor of the development process. Further, many existing CPGs are outdated or failed to be updated according to guideline recommendations, meaning that the recommendations may fall short of their purpose to translate up‐to‐date research findings.Future directionsFuture research should seek to systematically assess the quality of existing psychosocial oncology CPGs and shed light on the current state of implementation and adherence in clinical practice in order to better inform guideline developers on the current needs of the psychosocial oncology community.

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Réseau de cancérologie Rossy

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3