Affiliation:
1. Wageningen University and Research, Plant Science Group Wageningen The Netherlands
2. Aeres University of Applied Sciences Almere The Netherlands
3. Wageningen University and Research, Department of Social Sciences Wageningen The Netherlands
Abstract
AbstractToday, many cites in Europe have rediscovered urban and peri‐urban agriculture (UA) as a contributor to a more healthy and sustainable urban environment. However, UA has not yet unfolded its potential due to gaps in knowledge, expertise, and advocacy. A clear typology is instrumental in identifying, understanding, and acknowledging the potential of UA at different levels of policy making. Although a number of typologies are used in practice and in literature, an overarching typology that steps beyond the local and national perspective, and that includes promising innovations like vertical farming, is lacking. The aim of this paper is to offer such a typology of urban agriculture in Europe. Based on interviews with experts in the field representing 11 European countries (n = 16) and an online survey on characteristics and dimensions of UA initiatives (n = 112; representing 18 countries), our typology exists of six different UA types: (1) urban farm, (2) community park, (3) do‐it‐yourself garden/farm, (4) zero acreage farm, (5) social farm, and (6) community garden. Although this paper presents these types as distinctive entities, we stress that a typology is inevitably a simplification of reality, as in real‐life there is an overlap in the proposed types. Moreover, seeing that the field of modern UA is highly dynamic, the typology is only a snapshot of current‐day UA. That said, the suggested typology—along with the dimensions that characterize it—structures the apparent diversity of UA and is therefore instrumental as conversation starter of UA's potential in Europe.
Reference36 articles.
1. On the past and the future of the urban agriculture movement: Reflections in tribute to Jac Smit;Bellows A. C.;Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development,2010
2. Validating the City Region Food System Approach: Enacting Inclusive, Transformational City Region Food Systems
3. Cassatella C. &Gottero E.(2022).Type‐benefit matrix including set of indicators and benefit leaflets(H2020‐FNR‐2020 /H2020‐FNR‐2020‐1). Politecnico di Torino (Polito) European Forum for a Comprehensive Vision on Urban Agriculture (EFUA).
4. Home Gardening and the Social Divide of Suburban Space: Methodological Proposal for the Spatial Analysis of a Social Practice in the Greater Paris Urban Area
5. EFUA. (2022).European Forum on Urban Agriculture (EFUA 2020‐2024).https://www.efua.eu/about-efua
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献