Patient perspectives of general practice consultation for musculoskeletal disorders: A qualitative study

Author:

Thomas Rachel1ORCID,Berry Alice1ORCID,Cramp Fiona1ORCID,Walsh Nicola1

Affiliation:

1. School of Health and Social Wellbeing University of the West of England Bristol UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundMusculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs) are a significant reason for general practice consultations in the United Kingdom. Current models of care include consultation with a General Practitioner (GP) or a First Contact Physiotherapy Practitioner (FCPP). Evidence suggests that FCPP led care is safe, yet it is unknown whether patients share this belief.PurposeTo explore patients' perspectives of general practice consultation for MSKDs, including views on safety, satisfaction and recommendations for future practice.MethodsA secondary data analysis utilising qualitative data from the Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS‐PC) questionnaire completed by 426 general practice patients who consulted with a MSKD between December 2019 and October 2022. Responses to the question ‘What changes, if any, would you suggest to your GP surgery to make sure that health care is provided safely?’ were analysed using content analysis.Results606 responses across three timepoints were analysed. Two themes and six subthemes were identified; views on safety and satisfaction (inherent trust in the system, provision of face‐to‐face appointments, prompt access to care, person‐centred care) and recommendations for future practice (appointment system: prompt access to face‐to‐face appointments, delivery of care: co‐ordinated and collaborative person‐centred care).ConclusionsPatients commented that FCPP consultations provided quick and accurate diagnoses and targeted advice. Recommendations for future practice included prompt access to face‐to‐face appointments, phone calls to be answered more quickly, improved communication for test results and follow ups, patients to feel listened to with a more individualised approach, and better continuity of care.

Funder

National Institute for Health and Care Research

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3