Diversity–stability relationships across organism groups and ecosystem types become decoupled across spatial scales

Author:

Wisnoski Nathan I.123ORCID,Andrade Riley45ORCID,Castorani Max C. N.6ORCID,Catano Christopher P.7ORCID,Compagnoni Aldo89ORCID,Lamy Thomas1011ORCID,Lany Nina K.12ORCID,Marazzi Luca1314,Record Sydne1516ORCID,Smith Annie C.17181920,Swan Christopher M.21ORCID,Tonkin Jonathan D.222324ORCID,Voelker Nicole M.21ORCID,Zarnetske Phoebe L.1819ORCID,Sokol Eric R.2526ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biological Sciences Mississippi State University Mississippi State Mississippi USA

2. Wyoming Geographic Information Science Center University of Wyoming Laramie Wyoming USA

3. Department of Biology Indiana University Bloomington Indiana USA

4. Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana Illinois USA

5. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA

6. Department of Environmental Sciences University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia USA

7. Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA

8. Martin Luther University Halle‐Wittenberg Halle (Saale) Germany

9. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany

10. Marine Science Institute University of California, Santa Barbara Santa Barbara California USA

11. MARBEC University of Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD Montpellier France

12. Northern Research Station, Forest Service US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Durham New Hampshire USA

13. Institute of Environment Florida International University Miami Florida USA

14. Thames21 London UK

15. Department of Biology Bryn Mawr College Bryn Mawr Pennsylvania USA

16. Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Conservation Biology University of Maine Orono Maine USA

17. Department of Forestry Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA

18. Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior Program Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA

19. Department of Integrative Biology Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA

20. Washington State Department of Natural Resources Olympia Washington USA

21. Department of Geography and Environmental Systems University of Maryland Baltimore Maryland USA

22. School of Biological Sciences University of Canterbury Christchurch New Zealand

23. Te Pūnaha Matatini Centre of Research Excellence University of Canterbury Christchurch New Zealand

24. Bioprotection Aotearoa Centre of Research Excellence University of Canterbury Christchurch New Zealand

25. National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) Boulder Colorado USA

26. Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research (INSTAAR) University of Colorado Boulder Colorado USA

Abstract

AbstractThe relationship between biodiversity and stability, or its inverse, temporal variability, is multidimensional and complex. Temporal variability in aggregate properties, like total biomass or abundance, is typically lower in communities with higher species diversity (i.e., the diversity–stability relationship [DSR]). At broader spatial extents, regional‐scale aggregate variability is also lower with higher regional diversity (in plant systems) and with lower spatial synchrony. However, focusing exclusively on aggregate properties of communities may overlook potentially destabilizing compositional shifts. It is not yet clear how diversity is related to different components of variability across spatial scales, nor whether regional DSRs emerge across a broad range of organisms and ecosystem types. To test these questions, we compiled a large collection of long‐term metacommunity data spanning a wide range of taxonomic groups (e.g., birds, fish, plants, invertebrates) and ecosystem types (e.g., deserts, forests, oceans). We applied a newly developed quantitative framework for jointly analyzing aggregate and compositional variability across scales. We quantified DSRs for composition and aggregate variability in local communities and metacommunities. At the local scale, more diverse communities were less variable, but this effect was stronger for aggregate than compositional properties. We found no stabilizing effect of γ‐diversity on metacommunity variability, but β‐diversity played a strong role in reducing compositional spatial synchrony, which reduced regional variability. Spatial synchrony differed among taxa, suggesting differences in stabilization by spatial processes. However, metacommunity variability was more strongly driven by local variability than by spatial synchrony. Across a broader range of taxa, our results suggest that high γ‐diversity does not consistently stabilize aggregate properties at regional scales without sufficient spatial β‐diversity to reduce spatial synchrony.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference97 articles.

1. LONG-TERM MAPPED QUADRATS FROM KANSAS PRAIRIE: DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION FOR HERBACEOUS PLANTS

2. Alber M.2014a.“Mollusc Population Abundance Monitoring: Fall 2009 Mid‐Marsh and Creekbank Infaunal and Epifaunal Mollusc Abundance Based on Collections from Gce Marsh Monitoring Sites 1‐10 Ver 20.”Environmental Data Initiative.https://doi.org/10.6073/PASTA/49F83AD906FD8D5137B05B474D7A9D47.

3. Alber M.2014b.“Mollusc Population Abundance Monitoring: Fall 2010 Mid‐Marsh and Creekbank Infaunal and Epifaunal Mollusc Abundance Based on Collections from Gce Marsh Monitoring Sites 1‐10 Ver 6.”Environmental Data Initiative.https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/a2279d096ed0409aeaf37c92188e334c.

4. Alber M.2014c.“Mollusc Population Abundance Monitoring: Fall 2011 Mid‐Marsh and Creekbank Infaunal and Epifaunal Mollusc Abundance Based on Collections from Gce Marsh Monitoring Sites 1‐10 Ver 6.”Environmental Data Initiative.https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/66f227b8fd5d15c1b970a1c091b8e4a8.

5. Alber M.2014d.“Mollusc Population Abundance Monitoring: Fall 2012 Mid‐Marsh and Creekbank Infaunal and Epifaunal Mollusc Abundance Based on Collections from Gce Marsh Monitoring Sites 1‐10 Ver 11.”Environmental Data Initiative.https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/7249f6c7ffffb55dd8ab953f3dbe7f87.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3