On calibrated inverse probability weighting and generalized boosting propensity score models for mean estimation with incomplete survey data

Author:

Kang Joseph1ORCID,Morris Darcy Steeg1,Joyce Patrick1,Dompreh Isaac1

Affiliation:

1. Center for Statistical Research and Methodology U.S. Census Bureau Washington DC USA

Abstract

AbstractIncomplete data, whether realized from nonresponse in survey data or counterfactual outcomes in observational studies, may lead to biased estimation of study variables. Nonresponse and selection bias may be mitigated with techniques that weight the incomplete data to match characteristics of the partially unobserved complete data. Inverse probability weighting is a widely used method in causal inference that relies on a propensity model to construct adjusted weights; whereas calibration is a common method used by survey statisticians to use constrained optimization to construct adjusted weights. This article reviews inverse probability weighting and entropy balancing calibration by distinguishing them in the statistical sense of variable balancing, extending propensity score construction to include generalized boosting models, and demonstrating the use of inverse probability weighting and calibration separately and together through a widely cited simulation study evaluation.This article is categorized under: Statistical and Graphical Methods of Data Analysis > Sampling Data: Types and Structure > Categorical Data Statistical Learning and Exploratory Methods of the Data Sciences > Modeling Methods

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Statistics and Probability

Reference38 articles.

1. Matching on the Estimated Propensity Score

2. An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies

3. Buskirk T. D. &Kolenikov S.(2015).Finding respondents in the forest: A comparison of logistic regression and random forest models for response propensity weighting and stratification.Survey methods: Insights from the field pp. 1–17.

4. Cefalu M. Ridgeway G. McCaffrey D. Morral A. Griffin B. A. &Burgette L.(2021).twang: Toolkit for weighting and analysis of nonequivalent groups.R package version 2.5.

5. Using calibration weighting to adjust for nonresponse under a plausible model

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3