Affiliation:
1. École des hautes études en sciences sociales
Abstract
ABSTRACTThis paper critiques the recent use of Marshall Sahlins' model, which opposes big men to chiefs to establish a contrast between Austronesian and Non‐Austronesian communities in Oceania. By reviewing Sahlins' model and drawing upon Oceania‐wide ethnographic work, I argue that the two opposed paradigms underlying Sahlins' model of leadership, namely achievement and ascription, are in fact entangled in practices and in ideologies. I contend that the cooccurrence of ‘achievement’ and ‘ascription’ is widely supported by ethnographies of Oceania; that these two features can simultaneously characterize a single leadership position; and that this dual aspect of leadership is conveyed in Remote Oceania by the indigenous concept of mana. This suggests that the historical analysis of leadership in Oceania should move beyond this the achievement/ascription dichotomy. Thus, instead of mapping the region in terms of their absence or presence, it is more productive to analyse how these features articulate, or to focus on other aspects of leadership in Oceania such as the relation between leaders and deities or ancestors.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Anthropology
Reference69 articles.
1. Changing identities: The ethnohistory of Roviana predatory head‐hunting;Aswani S.;The Journal of the Polynesian Society,2000
2. The Archaeology and Ethnohistory of Exchange in Precolonial and Colonial Roviana
3. Ballard C.1995.The Death of a Great Land: Ritual History and Subsistence Revolution in the Southern Highlands of Papua New Guinea. PhD Thesis. The Australian National University AU.
4. Hierarchy, Founder Ideology and Austronesian Expansion
5. Some Comparative Notes on Proto-Oceanic *mana: Inside and Outside the Austronesian Family