Accuracy of Baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Staging Rectal Cancer Patients Proceeding Directly to Surgery

Author:

Milanzi Elasma1,Pelly Rachel M.1,Hayes Ian P.23,Gibbs Peter4,Faragher Ian5,Reece Jeanette C.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Neuroepidemiology Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health The University of Melbourne Carlton Victoria Australia

2. Colorectal Surgery Unit Royal Melbourne Hospital Parkville Victoria Australia

3. Department of Surgery The University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia

4. Personalised Oncology Division Walter and Eliza Hall Institute Parkville Victoria Australia

5. Colorectal Surgery Unit Western Health Melbourne Victoria Australia

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackground and ObjectivesHigh‐resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) accuracy for staging preoperative rectal cancer varies across studies. We examined MRI accuracy for T‐ and N‐staging of rectal cancer compared with final histopathology of the resected specimen in a large Australian cohort who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy or radiation.MethodsRetrospective analysis of prospectively‐collected clinical data from 153 rectal adenocarcinomas locally staged by high‐resolution MRI between January 2012 and December 2019 that did not undergo chemoradiotherapy or radiation before surgery. T‐ and N‐stage agreement between MRI and final histopathology was assessed using Kappa statistic. Agreement at each T‐stage was evaluated using log‐linear modeling. N‐staging accuracy was examined using positive and negative predictive values.ResultsOverall agreement between MRI and final histopathology for T‐stage and N‐stage was 55% and 65%, respectively. Kappa statistic found higher agreement between MRI and final histopathology for T‐staging (κ = 0.33) versus N‐staging (κ = 0.18). MRI correctly assessed 91% of T1 tumors, 43% of T2 tumors, 65% of T3 tumors, and 80% of T4 tumors. MRI accuracy was higher for N‐negative tumors (74.1%) than for N‐positive tumors (44.4%).ConclusionMRI is moderately accurate at staging T1, T3, and T4 rectal tumors but caution when staging tumors as T2 is advised. Greater accuracy for staging N‐negative versus N‐positive tumors is indicated.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3