Liver resection in patients with eight or more colorectal liver metastases

Author:

Viganò L12,Capussotti L2,Majno P34,Toso C34,Ferrero A2,De Rosa G5,Rubbia-Brandt L64,Mentha G34

Affiliation:

1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy

2. Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I, Torino, Italy

3. Department of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland

4. Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Centre, University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland

5. Department of Pathology, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I, Torino, Italy

6. Department of Clinical Pathology, University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland

Abstract

Abstract Background Patients with large numbers of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) are potential candidates for resection, but the benefit from surgery is unclear. Methods Patients undergoing resection for CRLMs between 1998 and 2012 in two high-volume liver surgery centres were categorized according to the number of CRLMs: between one and seven (group 1) and eight or more (group 2). Overall (OS) and recurrence-free (RFS) survival were compared between the groups. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify adverse prognostic factors. Results A total of 849 patients were analysed: 743 in group 1 and 106 in group 2. The perioperative mortality rate (90 days) was 0·4 per cent (all group 1). Median follow-up was 37·4 months. Group 1 had higher 5-year OS (44·2 versus 20·1 per cent; P < 0·001) and RFS (28·7 versus 13·6 per cent; P < 0·001) rates. OS and RFS in group 2 were similar for patients with eight to ten, 11–15 or more than 15 metastases (48, 40 and 18 patients respectively). In group 2, multivariable analysis identified three preoperative adverse prognostic factors: extrahepatic disease (P = 0·010), no response to chemotherapy (P = 0·023) and primary rectal cancer (P = 0·039). Patients with two or more risk factors had very poor outcomes (median OS and RFS 16·9 and 2·5 months; 5-year OS zero); patients in group 2 with no risk factors had similar survival to those in group 1 (5-year OS rate 44 versus 44·2 per cent). Conclusion Liver resection is safe in selected patients with eight or more metastases, and offers reasonable 5-year survival independent of the number of metastases. However, eight or more metastases combined with at least two adverse prognostic factors is associated with very poor survival, and surgery may not be beneficial.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3