Minimal clinically important difference in Alzheimer's disease: Rapid review

Author:

Muir Ryan T.12,Hill Michael D.12,Black Sandra E.34,Smith Eric E.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Department of Community Health Sciences Calgary Alberta Canada

2. Hotchkiss Brain Institute University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada

3. Division of Neurology Department of Medicine Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Toronto Ontario Canada

4. L.C Campbell Cognitive Neurology Research Unit Dr Sandra Black Centre for Brain Resilience and Recovery, and Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program Sunnybrook Research Institute Toronto Ontario Canada

Abstract

AbstractINTRODUCTIONWe conducted a rapid systematic review of minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) trial endpoints.METHODSTwo reviewers searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed from inception to June 4, 2023.RESULTSTen articles were retrieved. For mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a change of +2 to +3 points on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Subscale (ADAS‐Cog), +1 points on the Clinical Dementia Rating scale sum of boxes (CDR‐SB), −5 points on the integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS), or −1 to −2 points on the Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) was considered meaningful. For patients with mild AD, a change of +3 on the ADAS‐Cog, +2 points on CDR‐SB, −9 points on the iADRS, or −2 points on the MMSE was considered meaningful. For patients with moderate to severe AD, a change of +2 points on the CDR‐SB or a change of −1.4 to −3 points on the MMSE was considered meaningful.CONCLUSIONThis review identified previously published MCIDs for AD trial endpoints. Input from patients and caregivers will be needed to derive more meaningful endpoints and thresholds.Highlights This systematic rapid review identified thresholds for minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for recently used Alzheimer's disease (AD) trial endpoints: Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Subscale (ADAS‐Cog), Clinical Dementia Rating scale sum of boxes (CDR‐SB), integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS), Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE). MCIDs were higher for more severe stages of AD. Average treatment effects in recent trials of anti‐amyloid disease modifying monoclonal antibodies are lower than previously published MCIDs. In future trials of disease modifying treatments for AD, the proportion of participants in each treatment group that experienced a clinically meaningful decline could be reported. More work is needed to incorporate the values and preferences of patients and care partners in deriving MCIDs.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3