Transparency for what purpose?: Designing outcomes‐focused transparency tactics for digital platforms

Author:

Geng Yinuo12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Georgetown University Law Center Washington District of Columbia USA

2. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) Washington District of Columbia USA

Abstract

AbstractTransparency has long been held up as the solution to the societal harms caused by digital platforms' use of algorithms. However, what transparency means, how to create meaningful transparency, and what behaviors can be altered through transparency are all ambiguous legal and policy questions. This paper argues for beginning with clarifying the desired outcome (the “why”) before focusing on transparency processes and tactics (the “how”). Moving beyond analyses of the ways algorithms impact human lives, this research articulates an approach that tests and implements the right set of transparency tactics aligned to specific predefined behavioral outcomes we want to see on digital platforms. To elaborate on this approach, three specific desirable behavioral outcomes are highlighted, to which potential transparency tactics are then mapped. No single set of transparency tactics can solve all the harms possible from digital platforms, making such an outcomes‐focused transparency tactic selection approach the best suited to the constantly‐evolving nature of algorithms, digital platforms, and our societies.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Health Policy,Public Administration,Health (social science)

Reference100 articles.

1. Nudges for Privacy and Security

2. Gone in 15 seconds: The limits of privacy transparency and control;Acquisti A.;IEEE Security & Privacy,2013

3. Secrets and likes: The drive for privacy and the difficulty of achieving it in the digital age;Acquisti A.;Journal of Consumer Psychology,2020

4. Ada Lovelace Institute. (2021).Technical methods for regulatory inspection of algorithmic systems: A survey of auditing methods for use in regulatory inspections of online harms in social media platforms.https://www.adalovelaceinstitute.org/report/technical-methods-regulatory-inspection/

5. Allcott H. Gentzkow M. &Song L.(2021).How addicted are people to social media? We found a way to measure it.https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/07/19/social-media-addiction-social-science/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3