In vitro evaluation of bone cell response to novel 3D‐printable nanocomposite biomaterials for bone reconstruction

Abstract

AbstractCritically‐sized segmental bone defects represent significant challenges requiring grafts for reconstruction. 3D‐printed synthetic bone grafts are viable alternatives to structural allografts if engineered to provide appropriate mechanical performance and osteoblast/osteoclast cell responses. Novel 3D‐printable nanocomposites containing acrylated epoxidized soybean oil (AESO) or methacrylated AESO (mAESO), polyethylene glycol diacrylate, and nanohydroxyapatite (nHA) were produced using masked stereolithography. The effects of volume fraction of nHA and methacrylation of AESO on interactions of differentiated MC3T3‐E1 osteoblast (dMC3T3‐OB) and differentiated RAW264.7 osteoclast cells with 3D‐printed nanocomposites were evaluated in vitro and compared with a control biomaterial, hydroxyapatite (HA). Higher nHA content and methacrylation significantly improved the mechanical properties. All nanocomposites supported dMC3T3‐OB cells' adhesion and proliferation. Higher amounts of nHA enhanced cell adhesion and proliferation. mAESO in the nanocomposites resulted in greater adhesion, proliferation, and activity at day 7 compared with AESO nanocomposites. Excellent osteoclast‐like cells survival, defined actin rings, and large multinucleated cells were only observed on the high nHA fraction (30%) mAESO nanocomposite and the HA control. Thus, mAESO‐based nanocomposites containing higher amounts of nHA have better interactions with osteoblast‐like and osteoclast‐like cells, comparable with HA controls, making them a potential future alternative graft material for bone defect repair.