Association of polypharmacy and potential drug‐drug interactions with adverse treatment outcomes in older adults with advanced cancer

Author:

Mohamed Mostafa R.1ORCID,Mohile Supriya G.1,Juba Katherine M.23,Awad Hala1,Wells Megan1,Loh Kah Poh1,Flannery Marie4,Culakova Eva5,Tylock Rachael G.1ORCID,Ramsdale Erika E.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine University of Rochester Rochester New York USA

2. Department of Pharmacy Practice Wegmans School of Pharmacy Rochester New York USA

3. Department of Pharmacy University of Rochester Rochester New York USA

4. School of Nursing University of Rochester Rochester New York USA

5. Department of Surgery University of Rochester Rochester New York USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPolypharmacy is common in older adults who are starting cancer treatment and is associated with an increased risk of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential drug‐drug interactions (PDIs). The authors evaluated the association of medication measures with adverse outcomes in older adults with advanced cancer who were receiving systemic therapy.MethodsThis secondary analysis from GAP 70+ Trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02054741; principal investigator, Supriya G. Mohile) enrolled patients aged 70 years and older with advanced cancer who planned to start a new treatment regimen (n = 718). Polypharmacy was assessed before the initiation of treatment and was defined as the concurrent use of eight or more medications. PIMs were categorized using 2019 Beers Criteria and the Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions. PDIs were evaluated using Lexi‐Interact Online. Study outcomes were assessed within 3 months of treatment and included: (1) the number of grade ≥2 and ≥3 toxicities according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, (2) treatment‐related unplanned hospitalization, and (3) early treatment discontinuation. Multivariable regression models examined the association of medication measures with outcomes.ResultsThe mean patient age was 77 years, and 57% had lung or gastrointestinal cancers. The median number of medications was five (range, 0–24 medications), 28% of patients received eight or more medications, 67% received one or more PIM, and 25% had one or more major PDI. The mean number of grade ≥2 toxicities in patients with polypharmacy was 9.8 versus 7.7 in those without polypharmacy (adjusted β = 1.87; standard error, 0.71; p <.01). The mean number of grade ≥3 toxicities in patients with polypharmacy was 2.9 versus 2.2 in patients without polypharmacy (adjusted β = 0.59; standard error, 0.29; p = .04). Patients with who had one or more major PDI had 59% higher odds of early treatment discontinuation (odds ratio, 1.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.03–2.46; p = .03).ConclusionsIn a cohort of older adults with advanced cancer, polypharmacy and PDIs were associated with an increased risk of adverse treatment outcomes. Providing meaningful screening and interventional tools to optimize medication use may improve treatment‐related outcomes in these patients.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference30 articles.

1. Cancer statistics, 2017

2. Polypharmacy: evaluating risks and deprescribing;Halli‐Tierney AD;Am Fam Physician,2019

3. Polypharmacy Management in the Older Adults: A Scoping Review of Available Interventions

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3