Affiliation:
1. Department of Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience DIS Study Abroad in Scandinavia Copenhagen Denmark
2. Department of Psychology Dickinson College Carlisle Pennsylvania USA
3. Centre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders (CREW) Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London London UK
4. Department of General Psychology University of Padova Padova Italy
5. South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust London UK
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundDespite several decades of treatment research for anorexia nervosa (AN), many of the same questions remain: how to boost enrollment, engage participants, prevent attrition, and meet the needs of a diverse patient population within the rigorous framework of a randomized controlled trial (RCT).MethodsIn this research forum, we highlight some of the challenges and opportunities observed over the course of TRIANGLE, the largest RCT for severe AN treatment in the UK to date. We discuss strategies for addressing common challenges and avoiding common pitfalls and propose solutions to future researchers seeking to conduct treatment research in AN.ResultsOur experience underscores the value of involving people with lived experience at every stage of intervention research. We offer additional recommendations for treatment researchers, including, (1) early qualitative research to identify patient barriers and obstacles, (2) clear, systematic collaboration with clinical sites for patient recruitment and passive data collection, (3) careful consideration of assessment metrics, including repeated measurement of quality of life, (4) adopting a flexible, patient‐centered approach to clinical trial research, and (5) considering the unique needs and obstacles that might impact carer participation in research and their ability to provide support to their loved ones.DiscussionWe hope that these lessons learned will prove fruitful for the next generation of researchers embarking on treatment research for AN.Public SignificanceUsing the TRIANGLE trial as an illustrative case study, we highlight the value of lived experience and codesign for developing and testing interventions for AN. We offer several lessons learned over the course of the trial, pertaining to trial enrollment, retention and engagement, measurement of outcomes, and research adaptations for real‐world settings, and hope that these recommendations facilitate future treatment research for AN.
Funder
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust